DIF Hockey Forum

pulverapa skrev:Så här säger reglerna i NHL:

When the net becomes displaced accidentally. The goal frame is considered to be displaced if either or both goal pegs are no longer in their respective holes in the ice, or the net has come completely off one or both pegs, prior to or as the puck enters the goal.

Så här säger reglerna i IIHF (Sverige):

The net must be flat on the ice and in its normal position in order for a goal to be allowed.

Det verkar alltså som att domaren dömde bort målet korrekt igår men missade alltså att ta en utvisning på en Karlskrona-spelare som borde åkt ut för interference/tripping på Ölvestad.

Personligen tycker jag att NHL:s regel är mycket bättre här. Den stävjer fusk från det försvarande laget och nu när det finns så mycket målkameror runt om i europeiska ligor så borde det inte vara något problem att ha samma regel som i NHL. Fan vad svårt det är att vara supporter med alla dessa regler... Jag trodde att det var NHL-regeln som gällde även internationellt.

Här finns en lista på regler som skiljer sig mellan NHL och IIHF:

http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=60036

Rule 63 - Delaying the Game – 63.6 – Awarded Goal - When the goal has been displaced, either deliberately or accidentally, by a defending player, prior to the puck crossing the goal line between the normal position of the goalposts, the referee may award a goal. The attacking player must have been in the act of shooting, and the puck would have entered the area normally occupied by the net, a goal may be awarded by the referee.

Rule 554(b) – Displacing the Goal Frame - When the goal has been deliberately displaced by a defending player, a minor penalty shall be assessed. If this occurs in the last two-minutes of the game or anytime in overtime, a penalty shot shall be awarded. If this occurs when the attacking player is on a breakaway, a penalty shot shall be awarded. If this occurs when the offending team's goalkeeper has been removed from the ice, a goal shall be awarded.

63 är för NHL